Um estudo procurou verificar como as pessoas comportam com a seleção e o processamento de informação durante a pandemia do Covid-19. Olhando como as pessoas selecionavam as notícias consumidas, os pesquisadores apresentavam notícia ou otimista ou pessimista. Em um grupo, também mostravam a fonte da informação (New York Times ou Fox News). A conclusão foi que o viés da confirmação foi relevante no processo. Por exemplo, um pessoa pessimista, por exemplo, dedicava mais atenção para a notícia pessimista.
Eis o abstract:
How people form beliefs is crucial for understanding decision-making under uncertainty. This is particularly true in a situation such as a pandemic, where beliefs will affect behaviors that impact public health as well as the aggregate economy. We conduct two survey experiments to shed light on potential biases in belief formation, focusing in particular on the tone of information people choose to consume and how they incorporate this information into their beliefs. In the first experiment, people express their preferences over pandemic-related articles with optimistic and pessimistic headlines, and are then randomly shown one of the articles. We find that respondents with more pessimistic prior beliefs about the pandemic are substantially more likely to prefer pessimistic articles, which we interpret as evidence of confirmation bias. In line with this, respondents assigned to the less preferred article rate it as less reliable and informative (relative to those who prefer it); they also discount information from the article when it is less preferred. We further find that these motivated beliefs end up impacting incentivized behavior. In a second experiment, we study how partisan views interact with information selection and processing. We find strong evidence of source dependence: revealing the news source further distorts information acquisition and processing, eliminating the role of prior beliefs in article choice.
Postagens
